Evergreen Online The Newsletter of Wirral Environmental Network |
|
Digest Edition December 2003 / January 2004 |
In this month's online edition: Dying For The Future ? Esso - We've got you surrounded Support for Welsh wind farms |
DYING FOR THE FUTURE ? |
|
All our lives in the year 2020 could be startlingly different from today, the UK's Environment Agency believes. Using a fictional family called the Dumills, the agency describes a Britain where solar power dominates and every loo has a robot to analyse excrement. We can look forward to cleaner air, better public transport and an end to infuriating traffic jams, it suggests. The portrait of Britain's future was debated at the Environment 2003 conference held in London at the end of October. The attempt at futurology on the part of the Environment Agency (EA) is intended to make people think about where we might be headed if certain polices are adopted - or not. The agency has invented a family called the Dumills, who live in South East England in the year 2020, to make its point. The Dumills inhabit a world that is in some ways "less modern" - many homes grow their own food because, thanks to soaring oil prices, imported food is too expensive. In other ways however, the Dumills' existence is truly futuristic, with all human excrement being automatically analysed by a robot in the loo. Many children are adopted, including the Dumills' daughter Britney. Plummeting sperm counts have made natural conception very difficult. Most workers are immigrants because global warming has rendered large swathes of the world uninhabitable. The Dumills, who do not have a genetic predisposition to disease, are the lucky ones. Environmentalists and MPs have gathered for the Environment 2003 conference, co-hosted by the EA, to discuss how Britain might build a more sustainable future. Speakers were to include the Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett and Tony Juniper, the head of Friends of the Earth. Margaret Beckett and Tony Juniper warn that global warming might force millions of people to move across the world because of flooding and droughts. Along with the international development minister, Hilary Benn, Ms Beckett has commissioned a new report on water and sanitation. A taskforce has also been set up to push Britain towards a more sustainable future. The initiative will encourage every household to have its own water purification and recycling unit. Gadgets and technical fixes are only part of the answer, and a cultural shift in society is needed, according to Barbara Young, the Environment Agency's chief executive. The use of resources like power, water and wood needs to be strictly monitored - and restricted. However, not everyone believes such dramatic measures are really necessary. Prominent global warming sceptic Philip Stott believes the Environment Agency's vision of the future is alarmist and, he argues, not supported by science. "These scenarios are, in one sense, 'utopian', in that they are about worlds that are unlikely to exist anywhere (even in Tunbridge Wells), while they stem from a dystopian premise that everything about the modern age is gloom and doom," said Stott, Professor Emeritus, University of London. "Like Eeyore, the EA should be left to ruminate in a boggy place, while the rest of us enjoy our lives and continue to develop without being lectured to by these worryworts." |
|
Esso - We've got you surrounded ! |
The chair of ExxonMobil International (Esso in Europe) was heckled by a 3000-watt broadcasting system as he made a speech in London earlier in November. Andrew Swiger was speaking in front of hundreds of executives at the Intercontinental Hotel, during a conference called "Oil and Money", when Greenpeace broadcast the warning to "come out with your hands up". Esso is a climate change criminal that has orchestrated a ten-year dirty tricks campaign against international action on global warming. The warning blasted out, "You are surrounded, come out with your hands up - you and your company, Esso, are surrounded on all sides. You are surrounded by eminent scientists who tell you that global warming is happening and that it is caused by burning fossil fuels. By world leaders like Tony Blair. By the one million UK drivers who refuse to buy your products". The 24th Oil and Money conference has seen the most powerful movers in the global oil market gather to discuss the future of the industry. The chief executives of BP and Shell were among those gathered to hear Swiger's speech. But the Greenpeace truck, parked next to the conference room's window, disrupted the proceedings. Five volunteers were chained to the truck to prevent it being removed. Two were cut off and all five were later arrested and charged with causing a public nuisance. Esso has done more than anyone (except George Bush) to stop the world from tackling climate change - caused by the burning of fossil fuels. It has: Channelled huge sums of money to influential Washington front groups that deny global warming is even happening. Orchestrated a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign against efforts to cut US greenhouse emissions. Wilfully distorted the science of climate change. Don't buy Esso. Link: www.stopesso.com |
Support for Welsh wind farms |
More than three times as many local residents support an offshore windfarm proposal in South Wales than oppose it, according to results of an independent poll carried out by ICM research. The proposed windfarm will lie at Scarweather Sands - three miles off the coast of Porthcawl in Swansea Bay - and will produce enough electricity to supply 80,000 homes, equivalent to a town the size of Swansea. This wind farm is crucial in setting the precedent for renewable energy. If the public supports this, it could mean more wind farms will get the go-ahead in the future. Find out more about the Scarweather Sands wind farm proposal Residents were surveyed within three local authority areas, Swansea, Neath/Port Talbot and Bridgend. 54% of respondents said they supported the Scarweather Sands windfarm proposal, while only 14% said they were opposed to the development. Support for the offshore windfarm was strongest amongst those who lived closest to the coast. 58% of residents living within 3 miles of the coast supported the plans with 14% opposed. The most active public debate about the windfarm has taken place within the Bridgend authority area. Here opinions were slightly stronger with 60% in favour and 16% opposed. The results of the independent poll represent a huge show of local support for the Scarweather Sands windfarm ahead of a public inquiry, which is taking place at Port Talbot from 4th November 2003. The inquiry is expected to take about four weeks before passing on its decision to the Welsh Assembly. Link: www.yes2wind.com |